You may only read this site if you've purchased Our Kampf from Amazon or Powell's or me
• • •
"Mike and Jon, Jon and Mike—I've known them both for years, and, clearly, one of them is very funny. As for the other: truly one of the great hangers-on of our time."—Steve Bodow, head writer, The Daily Show

"Who can really judge what's funny? If humor is a subjective medium, then can there be something that is really and truly hilarious? Me. This book."—Daniel Handler, author, Adverbs, and personal representative of Lemony Snicket

"The good news: I thought Our Kampf was consistently hilarious. The bad news: I’m the guy who wrote Monkeybone."—Sam Hamm, screenwriter, Batman, Batman Returns, and Homecoming

November 07, 2004

Jonah Goldberg: "America Is The Corleone Family"

How can it be that people can vote based on "moral values" that seem to have little relationship to, you know, values? How can moral values mean no to gay marriage but yes yes yes to a meat-grinder war based on lies?

If this confuses you, you should immediately run to a book store and buy Life and How to Survive It by John Cleese and Robin Skynner. No, there is no time for you to put on clothes beforehand. There is also no time, if it is the middle of the night, for you to wait until the stores opens. You must break in naked and READ THIS BOOK. This is important, the police will understand.

Cleese and Skynner spend a great deal of the book discussing moral values. Their main points are these:

(1) Everyone everywhere shares the same values: loyalty, honesty, caring for others, etc.
(2) BUT -- people interpret these values according to their level of mental health.

"Mental health," as Cleese and Skynner define it, is a measure of how in touch you are with reality. Thus, people more in touch with reality interpret these values in healthier ways. Those less in touch with reality interpret them in unhealthy ways.

What does this mean in practice -- say, concerning the value of loyalty?

Robin Skynner: Each person will bring their own family attitudes and feelings to their interpretation of myths about loyalty. So if they come from a very unhealthy family, they'll feel that the group should all hold practically identical views, and that anyone who questions these views is a "trouble-maker" who is being "disloyal"; they'll feel hostility toward outside groups, and a disregard for the rights of such "outsiders"; and they'll feel intense and demanding dependence on all the other members of the group...

John Cleese: In other words, loyalty, to unhealthy people, is simply paranoia dressed up and relabeled.

Robin Skynner: That's what it amounts to, seen from a level of health above it. Remember the Mafia refer to the requirements of silence about all their crimes as omerta -- honor! And of course it does represent a higher level of health than disloyalty, where everyone in a society is betraying everyone else.

Cleese and Skynner say that all this, on a larger scale, applies perfectly to politics. But can they be right? For instance, are there really people who view America as one big crime family?

YOU BET THERE ARE. Cue Jonah Goldberg, scion of Lucianne Goldberg and something-or-other at National Review:

On the worst day in a string of exceptionally bloody days for U.S. troops, U.S. Sen. Ted Kennedy, serving as John Kerry's designated rhetorical bomb-thrower, said precisely what our enemies wanted to hear.

He shouted: "Iraq is George Bush's Vietnam, and this country needs a new president"...

Remember why Vito Corleone was gunned down in The Godfather? It was because Sonny let it slip that the Corleone family was divided -- just a tiny bit -- on a minor issue. This was all the incentive that opportunistic enemies needed to pounce.

It's not the best analogy in the world, but it does capture an important element of how our enemies think.

Note that even Goldberg draws back from the brink, and blames the necessity to act like the Corleones on "our enemies." You see, it's not that we want to squelch all internal disagreement, but what else can we do when surrounded by merciless killers waiting to strike?

Of course, Saddam Hussein -- whose favorite movie supposedly was The Godfather -- would tell you exactly the same thing.

Posted at November 7, 2004 08:44 PM | TrackBack
Comments

"How can moral values mean no to gay marriage but yes yes yes to a meat-grinder war based on lies?"

When the Democrats nominated someone who not only voted for that war (and no hair-splitting, please, about what that vote was for) but participated fully in broadcasting those very same lies about it...

When that nominee then went on to glorify the meat-grinder war based on lies that he had fought in...

And when that nominee promised to fight the current meat-grinder war harder, more effectively, and with more troops and allies...

The opposition had a choice. It could stand up for its values, or it could stand up for this politician. Having made its choice, it can't complain now that it lost this "values" election. It has nobody but itself to blame for going into the battle unarmed with values of its own.

The Democrats, and sadly much of the rest of the opposition, not only capitulated in the values war about Iraq but in fact turned traitor and worked for the other side. Now we get to reap the harvest.

Posted by: Moorlock at November 8, 2004 12:51 PM