You may only read this site if you've purchased Our Kampf from Amazon or Powell's or me
• • •
"Mike and Jon, Jon and Mike—I've known them both for years, and, clearly, one of them is very funny. As for the other: truly one of the great hangers-on of our time."—Steve Bodow, head writer, The Daily Show

"Who can really judge what's funny? If humor is a subjective medium, then can there be something that is really and truly hilarious? Me. This book."—Daniel Handler, author, Adverbs, and personal representative of Lemony Snicket

"The good news: I thought Our Kampf was consistently hilarious. The bad news: I’m the guy who wrote Monkeybone."—Sam Hamm, screenwriter, Batman, Batman Returns, and Homecoming

October 06, 2006

I Am Going To Help Thomas Friedman Engage In Radical Free Trade

There are many, many funny things about Thomas Friedman. But Dean Baker here explains the funniest:

Mr. Friedman proclaims himself a “radical free trader” and criticizes the people who oppose a new WTO treaty and the other trade agreements being pushed by the Bush administration...

Mr. Friedman...relies on [government] protection in the form of copyright protection. If there were real free trade, anyone would be able to freely copy and circulate his Times Select articles. They would also be able to freely copy and circulate his books. But, the income of Mr. Friedman, and other politically powerful individuals, is dependent on the government’s prohibition of free trade, so the government enforces copyright protection – a relic of the Medieval guild system.

The fact is that Mr. Friedman is a radical protectionist; a man whose substantial income is entirely dependent on government intervention in the market.

Yes. Listening to Thomas Friedman is like being lectured by Bill Clinton on how everyone on earth must refrain from having sex with Monica Lewinsky.

I was in cab in Mumbai when it suddenly hit me: the main problem on earth today is people who try to have sex with Monica Lewinsky. Oral sex in particular! Oh, that makes me SO MAD.

Anyway, to help Thomas Friedman engage in the radical free trade he so craves, I've pasted his column from today below. I may do this with each of his columns from now on, given that I know he would never want the government to intervene in the economy by stopping me.

October 6, 2006
Op-Ed Columnist
Big Ideas and No Boundaries
By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN

My rabbi told this joke on Yom Kippur: At the front of the lunch line at a parochial school was a bowl of apples with a sign that read: “Take only one. God is watching.” At the end of the lunch line, after the entrees, was a bowl of cookies, where a student had put up a sign: “Take all you want. God is watching the apples.”

Somehow that joke reminds me of the debate about free trade in America today. Right now, with the Republicans in charge, free trade is secure. Yet, while everyone is watching the front of the line, out back in the country, an erosion of support for free trade is under way. The “Doha” trade talks have stalled, because of opposition by U.S. farmers, and the White House’s “fast-track” authority to negotiate free trade agreements expires soon. With protectionist-leaning Democrats likely to take the House or Senate, any new free-trade accords will probably be stalled.

I hope Democrats won’t go this route. I’ve always believed in free trade, accompanied by better pension and health care safety nets. But I’m not a free trader anymore. I’m now a radical free trader. Why? Because in this new era of globalization, so many people now have the communication and innovation tools to compete, connect and collaborate from anywhere. As a result, business rule No. 1 today is: Whatever can be done will be done by someone, somewhere. The only question is whether it will be done by you or to you. In such a world, the way our society flourishes is by being as educated, open and flexible as possible, so more of our people can do whatever can be done first. It matters that Google was invented here.

“That society which has the least resistance to the uninterrupted flow of ideas, diversity, concepts and competitive signals wins,” says Nandan Nilekani, C.E.O. of the Indian tech giant Infosys. “And the society that has the efficiencies to translate whatever can be done quickly — from idea to market — also wins.”

The old left thinks free trade is something that benefits only multinationals. In fact, it is now critical for small businesses and individuals, who can now act multinationally. They are the ones who create good jobs.

Last week, I was in Nebraska, where I met Doug Palmer. He and his partner, Pat Boeshart, make insulated concrete forms for buildings. The traditional way to insulate concrete with foam is to make the foam and then truck it around the country to building sites to be attached to concrete. Mr. Palmer’s company, Lite-Form, found a Korean machine that, when combined with devices added by his firm, can make the foam and concrete together on site, saving big dollars in trucking. Today, Mr. Palmer’s South Sioux City company imports these machines from Korea, attaches its devices and exports them to Kuwait. His company has an Arabic brochure that tells Kuwaitis how to use the device. The brochure was produced by a local ad agency owned by the Winnebago Indian tribe of Nebraska. The agency was started by the tribe’s economic development corporation. Midwest Indians publishing Arabic brochures for Nebraskans importing from Koreans for customers in Kuwait ...

“Protectionism scares me,” said Mr. Palmer, who has 28 employees. “If we put up a moat and keep doing what we’re doing, thinking we’re the smartest in the world, we’re going to die. We have to have that flexibility to barter and trade.”

A few days later, in Silicon Valley, I met Arijit Sengupta, a young Indian-American educated at Stanford, whose company, “BeyondCore,” developed a software algorithm able to detect and reduce errors in outsourced back-office work. When I met Mr. Sengupta, he handed me a card with his logo, which, he explained, was designed by a graphic artist he found online in Romania. His database and Web server are freeware, and he has outsourced his marketing, sales support and patent filings to Indian firms. When I asked, “Where’s your office?” he held up his BlackBerry, which takes calls forwarded from numbers in India, Boston and Palo Alto. He and his seven workers already have one Fortune 500 client.

“When I started this company I never had to think about geography,” he said. “All I had to think about was: Where was the best resource to get something done. ... What you need are the big ideas. That is the tough thing to come up with.”

The way you keep good jobs in this country is not by building big walls, but by attracting people with big ideas — and then giving them the freedom to do whatever can be done with anyone, anywhere, anytime.

Posted at October 6, 2006 09:42 AM | TrackBack
Comments

I don't really think it's fair to demand Friedman be internally consistent. This is the same guy that wants unrestrained uuber alles, unless it's with dirty socialists like Chavez, in which case we need a massive gasoline tax to decrease or demand for his product.

But we can't decrease gasoline demand via public transportation works projects, because that would make us dirty socialists too, and government interference in the market is only OK if the little guy gets screwed. That way, everybody has a chance to succeed.

*head explodes*

Posted by: James Cape at October 6, 2006 10:47 AM

If we put up a moat and keep doing what we’re doing, thinking we’re the smartest in the world, we’re going to die.

Please! Take my job and ship it abroad! Now! Please! I don't want to die!

Posted by: abb1 at October 6, 2006 11:05 AM

Dear Tommy:
Trade with nations the workers of which are not free to engage in meaningful bilateral collective bargaining is not free trade; it's support by purse of slavery, the preferred labor market of shortsighted capitalists everywhere. (Google Moses Jews Pharoah for background)

The good or evil of protectionism depends entirely on what is being protected. Fortunately for you, intellectual property law does not distinguish between your efforts and, say, Leonard Cohen's, i.e., between the labor which produces coprolitic dung and that which makes honey.

Posted by: cavjam at October 6, 2006 11:15 AM

Please, Jonathon. I'm begging you. Go violate someone else's Digital Millenium Copyright Act protections! I can't take much more of this without beating Friedman's face into a quivering mass of toothless pulp.

Posted by: MarcLord at October 6, 2006 12:32 PM

Jesus, you guys are way behind the times. Taking a page from his own book, Mr. Friedman long ago outsourced the writing of his columns to a small team of writers working out of Kerala. I've even got a copy of the template they use:

intro[
[humorous anecdote | story about someone I met on a plane]
]
thesis statement[
[free trade is great|the united states is great|muslims/arabs desperately need to be taught to be civilized]
]
example1[
[! e.g., quote from CEO of paper-clip company with bending unit in Irkutsk ]
]
example2[
[! e.g., quote from chai-wala in Mumbai with no relevant expertise on subject of article]
]
example3[
[! e.g., quote from 'typical' American - owner of small business, owner of large business, investor, etc.]
]
conclusion[
[thesis statement] is self-evident and obvious.
]

Posted by: saurabh at October 6, 2006 12:45 PM

yes, just when i thought it had peaked, ATR incorporates one of the most hilarious columnists in the WORLD into its weekly diet. this is sure to maintain your position in the creme de la creme of ironyblogers

Posted by: almostinfamous at October 6, 2006 12:50 PM

I'm with MarcLord. Giving up my Krugman and Herbert fix was a small price to pay for not having access to the flat earth of Mr. Globaloney and not seeing him quoted in blogs.

Posted by: Bob at October 6, 2006 01:17 PM

Friedman never got to me as much as David Brooks. Both are infinitely awful, but [reference to that thing where there are different sizes of infinites, from math or something].

Posted by: Adam Kotsko at October 6, 2006 01:50 PM

"[Blah blah blah...] His database and Web server are freeware... [Blah blah blah...]"
Hilarious!

Note to the humour impared: His business depends on the efforts of those who think IP laws are too restrictive.

Posted by: coriolis at October 6, 2006 02:42 PM

JS, I think you should either host a Thomas Friedman contest, or a Thomas Friedman drinking game.

Posted by: Jonathan Versen at October 6, 2006 03:56 PM

Jonathan, I would be very careful about flaunting copyright law. It may be a leftover from medieval times but they are real and people do end up in court for breaking these laws.

It was Bill Clinton along with his republican friends who gave us NAFTA which has cost the jobs of millions of Americans. NAFTA of course is a give away to foreign investors and has nothing to do with free trade.

http://www.citizen.org/trade/nafta/

"In fact, calling NAFTA a “trade” agreement is misleading, NAFTA is really an investment agreement. Its core provisions grant foreign investors a remarkable set of new rights and privileges that promote relocation abroad of factories and jobs and the privatization and deregulation of essential services, such as water, energy and health care."

* * *
To me it would seem that this fits in nicely with the idea that what leaders do is motivated by the gain of power and keeping it rather than doing what benefits the nation as a whole.

Posted by: rob payne at October 6, 2006 11:01 PM

Fuck Tom Friedman. I'd like to meet him one day so I can liberate his wallet.

Posted by: Axis of Evel Knievel at October 7, 2006 02:56 AM

The person who has the most to fear regarding copyright law violations is saurabh--he just plagiarized every Friedman column ever written.

Posted by: at October 7, 2006 01:05 PM

I'm Tom Friedman and I thank you from the bottom of my heart.

Posted by: Tom Friedman at October 7, 2006 08:16 PM

Sorry to hear about your heartburn.

Posted by: rob payne at October 8, 2006 02:00 AM