You may only read this site if you've purchased Our Kampf from Amazon or Powell's or me
• • •
"Mike and Jon, Jon and Mike—I've known them both for years, and, clearly, one of them is very funny. As for the other: truly one of the great hangers-on of our time."—Steve Bodow, head writer, The Daily Show

"Who can really judge what's funny? If humor is a subjective medium, then can there be something that is really and truly hilarious? Me. This book."—Daniel Handler, author, Adverbs, and personal representative of Lemony Snicket

"The good news: I thought Our Kampf was consistently hilarious. The bad news: I’m the guy who wrote Monkeybone."—Sam Hamm, screenwriter, Batman, Batman Returns, and Homecoming

September 25, 2007

Tell Your Senators NOW To Oppose Kyl-Lieberman Amendment On Iran

The horrible Kyl-Lieberman Amendment on Iran may be voted on in the Senate as soon as today. Call your senator right now (Capitol switchboard: 202-224-3121) to tell them to oppose it.

I don't have any hope this will fail, but it would be nice for it not to be a shut out. Call now.

AND: You should write them, too. Get their contact forms at senate.gov or via Just Foreign Policy. A useful guide on writing to congress is here, although of course there's no time to send something by mail.

Posted at September 25, 2007 09:34 AM | TrackBack
Comments

Does anyone know if representatives and senators keep running records of the names of those who have contacted them, and what positions they took? I ask because I've fairly recently contacted my senators, and I wonder if having too many messages in the system will dilute the messages---as in "This person has too many liberal views; we're never going to make them happy anyway."

Posted by: Autumn Harvest at September 25, 2007 10:02 AM

No congressperson I'm aware of keeps contactee names. Very few congressperson I'm aware of even gives a fart in a high wind what the fuck their constituents think. Calling or writing your congressperson is about as useful as lips on a brick and, given the observable evidence, it would take massive amounts of stunning naivete to believe otherwise.

The VAST majority of letters get shredded unread. The VAST majority of phone messages get deleted un-listened to. Ask any staffer whose been around long enough.

Posted by: JimDandy at September 25, 2007 12:30 PM
The VAST majority of letters get shredded unread.

Perhaps I've been lucky, but the majority of times that I've sent in a snail-mail letter, I've received back a letter from my representative/Senator discussing their views/actions on the topic that I wrote in on. A form letter, I'm sure, but a form letter with the correct viewpoint and topic, which indicates that someone read the letter.

The defeat of the immigration reform bill gives "observable evidence" that, under some circumstances, congresspeople do give a fart what their constituents think.

Posted by: Autumn Harvest at September 25, 2007 02:28 PM

The defeat of the immigration reform bill gives "observable evidence" that your representatives know what their big business donors want. That fact that it may have coincided with your own views is completely incidental.

And, no, a form letter proves exactly jack shit. But go ahead and put pen to paper if it makes you feel better.

Posted by: JimDandy at September 26, 2007 12:28 PM

JimDandy knows the score. Spit in the wind if you like the feel of windy rain on your face. But don't deceive yourself -- it's saliva, not rain.

Posted by: The Wendigo at September 26, 2007 12:54 PM

JimDandy knows the score. Spit in the wind if you like the feel of windy rain on your face. But don't deceive yourself -- it's saliva, not rain.

Posted by: The Wendigo at September 26, 2007 12:54 PM
And, no, a form letter proves exactly jack shit.

Yes, and no. I agree that it doesn't prove that anyone cared about my viewpoint. But the fact that the responses had the correct view and topic proves that your claim that the vast majority of letters are shredded unread was incorrect. Which makes me think that despite the confident claims in your first post, about what you will find if you "ask any staffer," you don't actually have any knowledge of what goes on in a congressional office.

Incidentally, I'm not sure where you get the idea that I wanted the immigration reform bill defeated.

Posted by: Autumn Harvest at September 26, 2007 05:51 PM

FYI...I'm in CT, and when I call Dodd's office, they don't ask for contact info, but Lieberman's office takes my name and city.

Posted by: Syd at October 1, 2007 10:01 AM