• • •
"Mike and Jon, Jon and Mike—I've known them both for years, and, clearly, one of them is very funny. As for the other: truly one of the great hangers-on of our time."—Steve Bodow, head writer, The Daily Show
•
"Who can really judge what's funny? If humor is a subjective medium, then can there be something that is really and truly hilarious? Me. This book."—Daniel Handler, author, Adverbs, and personal representative of Lemony Snicket
•
"The good news: I thought Our Kampf was consistently hilarious. The bad news: I’m the guy who wrote Monkeybone."—Sam Hamm, screenwriter, Batman, Batman Returns, and Homecoming
May 12, 2008
Politico's Roger Simon Rewites Own History To Fluff McCain
It's not news that much of the corporate Washington press corps feels a burning love for John McCain. But it's still enjoyable to see the lengths to which they'll go for their political cuddlebunny. Take Roger Simon, chief political columnist for the Politico. Simon isn't just willing to rewrite history on McCain's behalf; he's willing to rewrite history he himself wrote.
In 1999 Simon was working for US News & World Report, for whom he produced a long, mostly glowing piece about McCain's first campaign for president. Here Simon explains why the press was smitten with McCain:
At 63, one of the oldest candidates in the race, he is a bundle of energy, powering through as many as eight speeches a day. Except when he sleeps, he is virtually never silent...It may be a high-risk way to run, but his whole campaign is high risk. "I decided that the planets were aligned and I had a shot at it," he says. "Not a very good shot, but a shot. I'm not going to be driven by a fear of losing. I'm going to have fun and enjoy it because I'll never do this again."
Obviously McCain did run again, but at the beginning of 2007 even his prospects of getting the Republican nomination looked uncertain. And so Simon wrote a bizarre, moony article imagining how McCain could still become the 44th president: with another campaign "about authenticity." In the new piece Simon reused almost all his McCain quotes from 1999, including the above section. Simon did, however, make one small change. See if you can spot it:
[McCain] would run again because he had faced that terrible dread that kept many from ever running: the humiliation of defeat. “I’m not going to be driven by a fear of losing,” McCain told his staff. “I’m going to have fun.”
There are so many funny things about this that you have to make a list.
1. It's funny that McCain, in order to explain how he was able to be so damn honest, said something that turned out not to be true.
2. It's even funnier that, in order to explain why honest John McCain was running again, Simon quietly excised that McCain had said to Simon that he wouldn't.
3. It's funniest of all that, in the original 1999 article, Simon had reported that journalists loved McCain so much that at one point on the Straight Talk Express a reporter "begged McCain to shut up and protect himself." But apparently this isn't necessary; McCain can say anything, and reporters will retroactively have him un-say it. (It's also odd that this reporter goes unidentified. It's hard not to wonder whether this is because his name was Roger Simon. In any case, it's an interesting example of press corps omerta, in which they rigorously eliminate any information their audience could actually use.)
Still, don't think for a minute Simon isn't deeply concerned about the way reporters tend to suck up to the powerful. As he recently wrote:
It is not surprising that so many politicians have such a low opinion of the media; we make it so easy for them to do so.
And why was Simon so unhappy with his colleagues? For the most obvious reason imaginable: because the media has given Barack Obama a free pass on Jeremiah Wright.
—Jonathan Schwarz
Posted at May 12, 2008 09:23 PMThis is great. McCain is a liar, Simon is a liar, Obama is a liar, and the American people lie to themselves. No wonder things are so magnificent.
Posted by: Rob Payne at May 13, 2008 12:39 AMJonathan,
You of all people should know that one can't allow the facts to get in the way of a good narrative; that's a basic element of good storytelling, which is, after all, the media's chief function.
Of course, I can see how one could think this country's elite publications should provide objective news and analysis of the day's events, but that's just not their purpose.
Actual tough reporting might also prevent some of these pseudo-celebrity journalists from being invited to the next BBQ bash at McCain's ranch. You do know that he's a maverick war hero who has taken on his own party, right?
Posted by: charles davis at May 13, 2008 12:51 PMCharles' comment brings to mind an interesting question. Does anybody remember McCain traveling to Liberty University in 2000, where he proceeded to offend fundamentalist evangelicals? If this is really what occurred, it's a pretty good example of taking on your own party.
So my question is, did this really occur the way it was reported? And what was McCain trying to do at the time?
Posted by: Aaron Datesman at May 13, 2008 01:36 PMAh, but you see it's the unwritten "law" of journalists and it comes from "The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance". When Jimmy Stewart's character admits he didn't shoot Liberty Valance, the journalist gets up and starts to leave saying he can't print that. When asked why he says, "When the legend becomes fact, print the legend."
Posted by: Tom at May 19, 2008 03:55 AM