• • •
"Mike and Jon, Jon and Mike—I've known them both for years, and, clearly, one of them is very funny. As for the other: truly one of the great hangers-on of our time."—Steve Bodow, head writer, The Daily Show
•
"Who can really judge what's funny? If humor is a subjective medium, then can there be something that is really and truly hilarious? Me. This book."—Daniel Handler, author, Adverbs, and personal representative of Lemony Snicket
•
"The good news: I thought Our Kampf was consistently hilarious. The bad news: I’m the guy who wrote Monkeybone."—Sam Hamm, screenwriter, Batman, Batman Returns, and Homecoming
December 07, 2011
Scott Walker, Sultan of Wisconsin
Scott Walker's administration just announced changes to the regulations governing demonstrations in Wisconsin:
Groups of four or more people must obtain permits for all activity and displays in state buildings and apply for those permits at least 72 hours in advance. The policy requires permits for 100 or more people outside the Capitol. The policy does provide some leeway for spontaneous gatherings triggered by unforeseen events.
Groups holding demonstrations could be charged for the costs of having extra police on hand for the event. Costs associated with a counterprotest could be charged to that second group. The costs would be $50 per hour per Capitol Police officer - costs for police officers from outside agencies would depend on the costs billed to the state. The police could require an advance payment as a requirement for getting a permit and also could require liability insurance or a bond.
When reading that I guessed that the State Department's annual Human Rights Report would criticize countries with similar policies, and thanks to Google, I quickly found out I was right:
Under the emergency powers, the [Brunei] government significantly restricted the right to assemble. According to the Societies Order, public gatherings of 10 or more persons require a government permit, and police have the authority to stop an unofficial assembly of five or more persons deemed likely to cause a disturbance of the peace.
Note that (1) Brunei is ruled by a literal Sultan and has been under martial law since 1962, and (2) its restrictions on freedom of assembly are in some respects LESS ONEROUS THAN WISCONSIN'S. Hopefully the State Department will soon release a Human Rights report examining the conditions in the sultanates of the upper midwest.
UPDATE: LorenzoStDuBios points out that I'm being too generous to Brunei, since their permitting requirement apparently restricts any kind of public gathering, whereas Wisconsin's new rule about four or more people gathering just applies to the inside of public buildings. I will change my proposed tourism slogan for the Badger State from "Wisconsin: More Oppressive Than Brunei" to "Wisconsin: Pending Further Changes, Still Somewhat Less Oppressive Than an Islamic Sultanate!"
—Jonathan Schwarz
Posted at December 7, 2011 09:48 AMWHAT IS the matter with these fools?
They need to participate ( obligatory ) in the UN Global Conversation on Human Rights ( OF COURSE, they have not read the US constitution ). MAY be, they will learn something....
Gosh, I can not understand how these characters end up as elected officials!!!!
http://www.un.org/en/events/humanrightsday/2011/
"I can't understand how these characters end up as elected officials." Just go out and meet the people, uhh.. Corporations that put them there. Drum roll, Kock brothers, Target, Wal Mart the list goes on.
Posted by: knowdoubt at December 7, 2011 12:35 PMThe Sultan of Wisconsin?
Posted by: N E at December 7, 2011 01:38 PM$50 an hour???
Posted by: brian at December 7, 2011 02:01 PM"costs for 'police officers' from outside agencies would depend on the costs billed to the state"- wonder if outsourced brownshirts cost more and wonder if it's ironic to call for cuts in government employee pay because they're overpaid compared to the private sector
Posted by: frankenduf at December 7, 2011 02:03 PMI don't want to be the Devil's Keanu here but isn't it one thing to restrict activity within government buildings and another... anywhere at all?
I mean, I am against all this authoritarian nonsense, and the comparison is fun, but isn't it also pretty disingenuous?
Posted by: LorenzoStDuBios at December 7, 2011 02:10 PM@knowdoubt
Just go out and meet the people, uhh.. Corporations that put them there. Drum roll, Kock brothers, Target, Wal Mart the list goes on.
OCCUPY VOTING STATIONS..... we demand candidates who are NOT BOUGHT by the lobbyists! OR.... we disrupt the elections! Non-violent civil disobedience for the good of the country!
Posted by: Rupa Shah at December 7, 2011 02:38 PMI'd NEVER go into the Sheridan City Hall again if I could avoid it. Since Dave Kinsey "THE MAYOR" banned me Oct 20 2009, I haven't been back since. Truth IS I believe him to be a good mayor for this city, but he's authortarian and a liberal gun control nut IMHO.
Posted by: Mike Meyer at December 7, 2011 04:32 PMAuthoritarian and "Liberal gun control nut"? what am I missing here?
Posted by: knowdoubt at December 7, 2011 06:10 PM@rupa I'm ready to try anything at this point we need some grand change, sooner rather than later.
Posted by: knowdoubt at December 7, 2011 06:13 PMknowdoubt: Just my opinion, from talking to Dave. Call him and ask, mention my name and YOU2 can be banned. I ask too many questions of OUR fair officials (they'll tell U the same), so I'm somewhat understanding AND GRATRFUL for the ban. I really didn't want to go there anyway.
Posted by: Mike Meyer at December 7, 2011 06:29 PM